Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D-NH) recently faced a pointed question from MSNBC regarding her stance on illegal orders and the US Military.
When asked directly what illegal orders she wants troops to refuse, Goodlander declined to answer, sparking interest in her position on military obedience and constitutional adherence ¹.
The exchange highlights the delicate balance lawmakers must strike between upholding the Constitution and respecting military hierarchy. Goodlander’s response, “Alex, we love this country, we love our Constitution.
It is our job as lawmakers, and especially in this moment, to be clear morally, to be clear legally,” suggests her commitment to constitutional principles without specifying potential illegal orders.
Background on Maggie Goodlander Maggie Goodlander is a Democratic representative from New Hampshire’s 2nd congressional district, serving since 2025.
A Yale-educated lawyer and former naval intelligence officer, Goodlander brings a unique blend of military and legislative experience to Congress.
Her background includes roles in the Biden administration and as counsel on the House Judiciary Committee during Trump’s first impeachment ¹.
Key Points from the Exchange * Goodlander refused to specify illegal orders troops should disobey * Emphasized lawmakers’ role in upholding the Constitution * Highlighted the importance of moral and legal clarity Goodlander’s Congressional Work As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, Goodlander is involved in shaping US military policy.
Her voting record and public statements reflect her focus on constitutional governance and national security ². The incident underscores ongoing debates about military obedience, executive power, and congressional oversight.
Goodlander’s measured response leaves room for interpretation, reflecting the complexity of balancing constitutional duties with military chain-of-command principles.
