In a rapidly escalating international crisis, Russia has publicly declared its readiness to support the Venezuelan government, reaffirming its political solidarity and commitment to provide necessary assistance amid rising tensions following recent U.S. military actions in Venezuela.
Moscow’s statements mark a significant geopolitical flashpoint, intensifying global attention on Latin America, great-power rivalries, and the broader implications for regional stability and international law.
Russia’s Official Response to U.S. Military Actions
On January 6, 2026, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a formal statement condemning the U.S. military operation against Venezuela, a move that resulted in dramatic developments including a change of leadership in Caracas and the capture of former President Nicolás Maduro.
In its statement, Russia described the U.S. action as an “armed aggression” against a sovereign nation and expressed deep concern about the destabilizing effects of foreign military intervention. The Russian Ministry emphasized that the U.S.
strike and subsequent political fallout represent a dangerous escalation that threatens peace and security not only in Venezuela but across the entire Latin American region. TASS
Reaffirming Solidarity and Sovereignty
Russia’s response has been unequivocal in defending Venezuela’s sovereignty. The Foreign Ministry underlined that Venezuela has the sovereign right to determine its own political future without destructive external interference.
This principle resonates with Moscow’s broader diplomatic framework, which opposes unilateral military intervention and champions state sovereignty as a cornerstone of international relations.
In this vein, Russia also reaffirmed its unwavering solidarity with the Venezuelan people and government, expressing readiness to offer necessary assistance to help Caracas navigate through the crisis and safeguard national interests.
According to the statement, Russia is committed to continuing bilateral cooperation, underlining the traditionally close ties between Moscow and Venezuela in political, economic, and military arenas.
Support for Venezuela’s New Leadership
Following the U.S. military operation that resulted in the ousting of Nicolás Maduro and his subsequent capture, Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president.
Russia welcomed this development, highlighting it as an effort by Venezuelan authorities to ensure national unity, maintain legal order, and prevent constitutional collapse in a moment of profound political uncertainty. A News
Moscow’s endorsement of Rodríguez’s leadership underscores its support for what it considers legitimate Venezuelan governance structures and serves as a political counterweight to Washington’s narrative of democratic transition or regime change.
Call for Dialogue and De-Escalation
Amid these heightened tensions, Russia has consistently urged all parties involved to seek peaceful solutions through constructive dialogue. Moscow’s position stresses that de-escalation and diplomatic engagement are essential to resolving disputes and avoiding further deterioration of the situation.
The Russian Foreign Ministry referenced principles of international law and the United Nations Charter, emphasizing that disputes between nations should not be settled by force but by negotiation and mutual respect. Tân Trung Quốc
This call for dialogue reflects Russia’s broader diplomatic messaging that international conflicts should be addressed through multilateral institutions and legal norms rather than military intervention.
International Reactions and Geopolitical Implications
The crisis in Venezuela has drawn widespread global reactions, with countries and regional blocs voicing opposition, concern, or support for different actors involved. Latin American nations such as Cuba, Mexico, and Brazil have condemned the U.S. actions, framing them as threats to regional sovereignty and international stability.
Additionally, Russia’s response has added a layer of complexity to international diplomacy, signaling a renewed great-power confrontation between Moscow and Washington. The crisis is occurring against the backdrop of ongoing tensions in other spheres, including Russia’s involvement in Europe, competition for energy markets, and differing visions for geopolitical order.
Historical Context: Russia–Venezuela Relations
Russia and Venezuela have maintained close diplomatic and economic ties for years. Under President Nicolás Maduro and before him under Hugo Chávez, Venezuela pursued a foreign policy that often aligned with Russia’s interests on the global stage.
These relations have included extensive energy collaboration, arms sales, and political support in international forums.
The current situation is not the first time Moscow has pledged full backing for Caracas in the face of U.S. pressure. In late 2025, Russia vowed its continued support to Venezuela amid tensions over U.S. enforcement actions against Venezuelan oil exports and naval encounters in the Caribbean Sea.
What This Means for the Region and the World
The fallout from the U.S. military action and Russia’s robust response carries significant regional and global implications:
Latin America’s Stability: Venezuelan political stability is critical for the broader region. A violent or prolonged conflict could prompt waves of refugees, economic disruption, and increased militarization among neighboring states. U.S.–Russia Relations: This incident deepens strategic friction between the two powers. While Russia pursues a diplomatic narrative stressing sovereignty and peaceful resolution, the U.S. justifies its actions on grounds of counter-narcotics and national security, further complicating bilateral relations.International Law and Norms: The crisis raises pressing questions about the legitimacy of unilateral military interventions and adherence to international legal frameworks. Russia’s insistence on dialogue underscores growing global calls for a rules-based international order where force is not used to settle political disputes.
Conclusion
As Venezuela remains at the center of a volatile geopolitical struggle, Russia’s declaration of support, solidarity, and readiness to assist brings global attention to issues of sovereignty, power politics, and the future of international diplomacy.
Moscow’s emphasis on dialogue and non-interference reflects its broader foreign policy stance, even as its actions contribute to growing tensions between major world powers.
For now, the international community watches closely, wary of further escalation but engaged in urgent discussions about how to preserve peace in Venezuela and uphold the core principles of international relations.
